STS The working library

Field Notes.

Practical frameworks for people building consequential systems.

25 published notes
01
Architecture

Decision Altitude: Why Good Technology Ends Up in the Wrong Layer

Three tests for deciding when a local solution should remain with a product team—and when it should become a shared platform capability.

7 minutes read →
07
Decision design

When Coordination Becomes the Work

A practical diagnostic for recognizing when repeated coordination means a capability is owned below the level of its consequences.

4 minutes read →
12
AI systems

Who Owns the System When the Model Is Wrong?

A diagnostic for finding the ownership gap between model operation and responsibility for the customer outcome.

4 minutes read →
10
AI architecture

AI-Enabled Can Be the Right End State

Primary-source evidence for keeping model dependency bounded when deeper integration does not justify the added maintenance, governance, and exit obligations.

4 minutes read →
11
AI architecture

Five Questions Before Calling a System AI-Native

A decision review for testing model dependency, system redesign, learning loops, evaluation ownership, and fallback before adopting an AI-native label.

4 minutes read →
13
Platform products

A Platform Should Sell a Capability, Not Its Machinery

A diagnostic for finding where an internal platform transfers its implementation complexity, support burden, and migration cost to product teams.

4 minutes read →
14
Platform products

A Capability Contract Makes the Platform Testable

A four-test review for turning an internal platform promise into observable behavior, explicit ownership, and a controlled change policy.

5 minutes read →
15
Platform products

The Migration Test for an Internal Platform

A review for separating necessary contract change from consumer work caused by platform machinery leaking through the boundary.

5 minutes read →
16
Platform product ownership

Self-Service Without Product Ownership Creates an Orphan

A source-backed ownership review for determining whether an internal platform is a product or an unattended interface.

4 minutes read →
17
Platform roadmaps

Review the Contract Before Adding Another Platform Feature

A source-backed roadmap review for separating consumer friction caused by a weak platform contract from a genuine need for another shared technical component.

5 minutes read →
18
Data enablement

Available Is Only the First State

A five-state diagnostic for finding where an internal data capability stops turning platform access into useful, repeated work.

5 minutes read →
19
Data enablement

Treat Data Enablement as a Product Funnel

A cohort-based review for turning data-platform adoption evidence into one bounded product decision.

6 minutes read →
20
Data enablement

Measure the Transition That Is Actually Breaking

Why aggregate platform adoption counts can send roadmap capacity toward the wrong problem.

4 minutes read →
21
Data enablement

More Documentation Does Not Repair Every Adoption Failure

DORA evidence shows that documentation matters, but the failing user transition should determine whether documentation is the right remedy.

4 minutes read →
22
Data enablement

A Platform Roadmap Needs an Adoption Hypothesis

A seven-part hypothesis that connects platform roadmap work to one user transition, one mechanism, and a decision rule.

4 minutes read →
23
Decision rigor

Decision Effort Should Follow Reversal Cost

A practical way to match architecture review, rollout, and ownership to reversal cost and blast radius.

4 minutes read →
24
Decision rigor

Reversibility and Blast Radius Belong in the Same Review

A two-axis architecture review for choosing the right commitment, rollout, and exit path.

5 minutes read →
25
Decision rigor

An Exit Path Is an Architectural Requirement

Public engineering evidence shows why a credible migration claim needs compatibility states, rollout signals, ownership, completion evidence, and a visible cost of leaving.

5 minutes read →
26
Decision rigor

Do Not Slow Every Decision

Evidence from DORA and Google SRE supports a selective review system that protects flow for contained changes and concentrates scrutiny on durable or broad commitments.

4 minutes read →
27
Decision rigor

Five Questions for High-Blast-Radius Choices

A five-question pre-mortem for exposing reversal cost, inherited consequences, detection limits, ownership, and smaller commitment options before a broad technical decision is approved.

4 minutes read →
28
Engineering economics

Every Architecture Contains an Incentive System

How architecture boundaries change incentives, transfer work, and create ownership obligations across teams.

4 minutes read →
29
Engineering economics

Five Economic Lenses for Engineering Decisions

A practical review of flow, option value, coordination cost, displaced work, and delay in engineering decisions.

5 minutes read →
30
Engineering economics

Local Efficiency Can Reduce System Flow

How shared constraints turn local activity into waiting, and how to choose a bounded improvement to delivery flow.

4 minutes read →
31
Engineering economics

Cost Reduction Is Not the Only Economic Question

Compare complete operating arrangements, including consumer work, useful options, and the consequence of delay.

4 minutes read →
32
Engineering economics

Put the Economic Consequence Next to the Technical Choice

Preserve economic assumptions, transferred work, owners, and review triggers beside an architecture decision.

4 minutes read →

+ Continue the system

Two useful systems syntheses each week.

Tuesday develops a costly operating problem. Friday turns the week's evidence, boundary, and practical conclusion into one synthesis.